Showing posts with label Camera. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Camera. Show all posts

Wednesday, 19 February 2014

Photography Lesson 01: The Basics

OK... there's so much to tell you that it's difficult to know where to start.

One piece of advice that I'd give you (as I wish I had gotten this myself) is to prioritise getting a good quality lens over a good quality camera. The quality of your pictures relies so much on the lens that there is no point getting a top of the range camera if you can not afford a top of the range lens to go with it!

Also, if you want advice on which lens to get, try to figure out what kind of photography you are most interested in and then go and use The Mighty Google for it can tell you many things that I can't. Such as that you'll want a pretty mighty zoom lens for wildlife, a macro lens for bug and pin-head close-ups and something in between for fashion!

Anyway, for advice on the kit that would best suit you and your needs, traverse the great interweb and see for yourself. Then come back and I'll tell you many secrets.

That aren't particularly secret.

So I'll start assuming that you've got your first SLR camera, complete with lens and now you're looking at how best to get started.

I think most of you will be tempted to get going and will do A Terrible Thing. This Terrible Thing is also known as putting your camera on the 'Auto' setting.

Don't do that. That is not how we learn magical things.

I'm now going to do my best to tell you, what I think, are the three fundamental settings to understand on your camera. In order of importance.

1. Shutter Speed
2. Aperture
3. ISO

These three things, in short, are all various ways of allowing the desired amount of light into the camera.

Shutter Speed
Cameras have this funky little thing called a shutter. It's called that, most probably (though I'm no expert) because it shuts.

The FASTER the shutter speed, the less the amount of light that makes it to the camera sensor and therefore the sharper the image. i.e. if you take a picture of someone jumping, a fast shutter speed will catch them in the air with no motion blur (as if they're hovering).

The SLOWER the shutter speed, the more light gets in but also, the more movement is captured in your image.

Now then, your camera's shutter speed value will be something like the following in your camera:
1/250 - a 250th of a second. That's pretty fast.
1/125 - a 125th of a second. Still pretty fast.
1/80 - an 80th of a second. Not all that fast.
1/20 - a 20th of a second. Getting pretty slow...
0''8 - 8 seconds. Really slow.
0''30 - 30 seconds. r e a l l y, r e a l l y   s l o w . . .

At 30 seconds, it's so slow, you can actually take pictures of stars at this speed and they will have moved in the time it has taken to take your picture. "Ain't nobody got time fo' dat!"

At the same time, slower shutter speeds can make for creative photography.

Examples:
This is an example of high shutter speed:



My kid brother, Matthew, is not in fact a Jedi. Nor is that a Jedi training ball. He has simply thrown this ball up in the air and due to the fast shutter, the ball's movement has not been captured. Making him look like a total Jedi badass.

This is an example of low shutter speed:



... as you can see, the stationary objects such as the desk and the stairs are in focus as I used a tripod for the long shutter speed. (Trying to get this effect freehand is nigh on impossible. Tripods are your friends - and are 'cheap as chips'.) Around the stairs however, there is a buzz of movement. This is because for the whole time the shutter is open, the camera is recording  everything it is 'seeing' reflected in the light.

Summary:
High shutter speed
- Fast shutter
- Images are cleaner, crisper, less blurry
- Less light gets into your image (meaning you'll have to get your light from somewhere else. Read on!)

Low shutter speed
- Slow shutter.
- Images are more blurry as motion is being captured.
- Lots of lovely light.

Aperture
So now we move onto the aperture. Unlike the shutter speed, the aperture is determined by the lens that you are using and is to set the size of the 'opening' within your lens. Simply put, the aperture determines how wide the hole is inside your lens when your picture is taken.

Now in a similar way, the smaller the aperture (the smaller the hole), the less light can get in and the wider, the more.

The difference is, instead of deciding whether there is motion blur by letting in more light, the aperture actually determines how much of your image is in focus depending on it's distance from your subject, known as the 'focal plane'.

This is known as the 'depth of field'.

The aperture, both when purchasing a lens and when setting the value from the camera itself is measured in 'f-stops' and will look like this:
f/1.2 - This is considered to be a top of the range feature as this aperture is pretty much as wide as it gets with today's lenses at the moment.
f/2.8 - This is a good aperture for a lens to get up to. Still useful
f/3.5 - This is getting pretty average and it's a poor maximum aperture for anyone wanting to work outdoors and with natural light.
f/8 - Only useful in extreme sunlight or studio.
f/11 - Only for use in big, bright studio. No light for you.

It's worth just mentioning in case I'm losing you here, that the smaller the f-stop value, the larger the aperture. Just to confuse you. ;)

When buying a lens, the lower the f-stop value, i.e. the wider the aperture, the more freedom you will have with the lens. That's why lenses with f/1.2 - f/2.8 are sickeningly expensive. Especially on zoom lenses.

Example of wide aperture:



Here, Leela's barely in focus outside of the range of her facial features. This is because the aperture is so wide and the focus was on her face. This is an example of a narrow depth of field and where this blur outside of the main focus point is severe, this is often referred to as "bokeh". Which, I remember looking up once and apparently, this is just from the Japanese word for blur.

So if someone comments on your Flickr image to say "Good bokeh" - you've done it right.

Example of narrow aperture:



In this image, practically everything is in focus. Because the aperture was narrower. This image also contains a very awesome tree. This was one of the first things I ever photographed (y'know, properly). :)

Good times.

ISO
ISO is a tricky beast. It stands for... *Googles*... OK well a lot of the people on Google have clearly Googled the term themselves and are claiming that it stands for "International Organisation for Standardisation" - but I happen to know that this is not what it stands for and they have instead looked up ISO accreditation... which is not the same thing. Stupid internet people.

OK. Forget what it means, that's not important. What's important is what it does.

What it does is it increases or decreases the sensitivity of the light sensor in your camera. A higher ISO is more sensitive and therefore increases the amount of exposure your image has to the light. The problem with a higher ISO is that it creates a more grainy image (graininess on a digital photograph is also referred to as 'noise' - useful tip when learning to edit) and for this reason, I always advise people generally that the last thing you want to compromise is your ISO because nobody but nobody wants a grainy or noisy image most of the time.

Your ISO range is determined by your camera body again, rather than your lens and in your camera settings it will look a bit like this:
100 - Bloody good ISO. Nice and crisp. No image compromise.
200 - Still bloody good.
400 - Yeah, still OK.
800 - Getting a bit of noise. Not too bad. Still workable.
1600 - :/
3200 - Christ, that's grainy.
6400 - Why did we ever go up to this setting? It looks awful. Canon, Nikon - Stahp!

Here is an image using a nice low ISO:



... Not a grain. Though I was only able to use the low ISO because I was in the studio. This is the ISO on it's lowest which isn't really possible unless you're using studio lights or bright sunlight for a light source.

Here's an image using a higher ISO:

May not look that bad from here but look at the quality difference:




Now there's no question. Am I right?

So, that's hopefully a useful start to shutter speed, aperture and ISO.

A few hints and tips for you:
If you don't want to go straight in at 'Manual' on the camera (though I always recommend throwing yourself in at the deep end, only you truly know if you can swim) there are two other functions that may help you get the hang of things.

Av: This is Aperture Priority. You set the aperture that you wish to shoot at and the other two settings will automatically accommodate to get the best lighting for you.

Tv: This is Shutter Priority. Same principle, this will let you decide what shutter you'd like to shoot at and the other two will accommodate the others automatically.

M: This is boss-mode. You decide the everything. But you hopefully won't accidentally end up with some grainy-ass images by mistake as normally, letting the ISO do what it wants means that it wants to get into the limelight and get as high as possible.

Best practise... decide whether you need crystal clear images or some 'good bokeh', etc and then, when you've compromised on shutter speed or aperture as much as you are willing, then and only then can you let the crazy ISO beast out of it's cage.

Practise makes perfect. Go out for the day with your camera and go nuts. Stick that bad boy on manual and take about a million shots that you never want to see again - but get that one that you're so proud of that you set it as your desktop background. Because you took that all by yourself. Clever thing.

:)

Wednesday, 14 December 2011

Maxine Avery: Evasive Beauty

Maxine Avery is a very good friend of one Rachel Nicholson
(best friends in fact. Hmph! Whatever... I don't care... *sob*).


Rachel had been talking about getting Maxine in front of the camera for a while. For some reason, I think she was pretty reluctant (Maxine, not Rachel). Must have been the horror of me potentially getting her clothes off as that seems to be what I do lately, but I'm very glad she came 'round if that's the case.


I got Rachel's house in Reading on the 20th November and she was applying Maxine's make-up. Already very uncomfortable as Maxine applies make-up for a living and so having someone else doing it was making her a tad antsy. :D


Simon and I set up the gear, and he made me a big cup of tea. Always a good start to the day. Thanks Simon... Good old Simon.


This calls for more Simon: get a load of Simon!


Yay Simon.

(The word 'Simon' is now starting to look funny... have I spelt it right? S-I-M-O-N... :s)

So meanwhile, Maxine is looking very 70's, man. And I think she's thinking it's looking pretty groovy actually. Austin Powers would approve. Yeah Baby.

So here's the start of our first set on white.

Awesome make-up from Rachel. Again.

We agreed that the eyes looked extremely 'Cheryl Cole'.
(Go ahead, try covering up the bottom half, I'll wait)



Lovely shot here in black and white too (oh yes it is).

And then we got some props in!

We stole (correct, stole) Simon’s ‘Lonely Hearts Club Band’ Beatles picture and took it out of it’s solid black frame… (NB: Apparently it's Rachel's picture. Sheesh! Sor-REE!)




I loved these. They were potentially my favourite from the shoot.

Especially that one! ^

I think this one feels a bit ‘Twiggy’ in black and white.
I can’t put my finger on what it is though.


And we also pinched Simon's retro gee-tarr metal canvas… thing which also looked ace, I thought. (NB: Again, apparently Rachel's. Who knew?)



The effect on these wasn’t achieved with any clever lighting. Just a red tone using the Variations feature in Adobe Photoshop. Bam. Job done.


I thought this gave them a cool vintage styling.

Next set, we had Maxine’s jumpsuit which looked wicked. Really pretty.


Loved this outfit.
:D





 
And then finally, we went outside...





I love these so much though. She's a cutie.

So that was Maxine. Whilst stunningly gorgeous and with a figure made of win... she doesn’t seem to think that she is ‘modelling material’.


What do we think folks?

Saturday, 23 July 2011

The 'Big Day'

As of the day that I have received my very first digital SLR camera. Ordered on Thursday 30th June 2011. Arrived at 10:45am on Saturday 2nd July 2011. Canon 7d. Beautiful. This is when everything gets a million times better for me.

Whilst the 350D was a great camera to learn with, I found the restrictions closing around me rather quickly when I started getting a bit more adventurous and wanted to do more with my camera. The more I got smothered, the more I lost my 'keen' for photos. I decided I was going to save up for a while and buy a better model before trying to do any more with it.

So I shelled out £1200 on a Canon 7D. My first digital SLR camera! Chosen for it's prettiness and it's 8fps shooting (I've missed out on a lot of epic action shots in the past two years... realised it was something I really wanted to dabble in more). I could not contain my excitement when it came. I might have welled up a little bit when I first saw it laying there in it's box. Totally new.


There it is. Straight out of the box. Body only. It's beautiful, isn't it? Makes you me want to cry.

I then preceeded to look at it for approximately 45 minutes before actually getting a lens on it and playing. Though, once that bridge was crossed, I then forced my other half's brother outside to play 'keepy-ups' with his football out in the garden while I took photos of him and played with the settings.

I couldn't believe how the camera just purred away taking pictures when I got it onto high-speed continuous shooting... I thought Adam was going to cry by the time I let him finish kicking that ball but he held himself together rather well. XD

I've still got a lot to play with on this camera though at the point of writing this blog entry I have already done 4 photoshoots, been on a film set and have another couple of shoots set up for tomorrow.

Want to see some images from it? Next blog for you then!